robdyke.com/noc

network operations centre…no overall control

  • Author: noc
  • Published: Sep 21st, 2006
  • Comments: None

Freedom of Information

Tags: , ,

After reading (and posting) Shahrar’s email I got thinking about what other information about parking and PCNs issued I could request from Brent Council under FoI.

How many of us have been issued a ticket because of a simple honest mistake, like, say, scratching off the wrong day on a parking voucher in error, or perhaps forgetting to note your registration on a temporary residents permit? Well that’s me on both counts.

How many of us have been issued a parking ticket due to an error on the part of the parking warden, like, say for example, parking a commercial vehicle in a resdential street contrary to local restrictions when no contravention could have occured as you were not driving a commercial vehicle and there were no such local parking restrictions? A bit of specific example I realise… Yes, me again.

When I make an honest mistake Brent Council will not hear your pleading and will not yeild their power to strike out the ticket, leaving you to either pay the PCN or meet Brent in court. Yet when a Brent Council Parking Warden makes a similar simple honest error, power is yielded and PCNs are cancelled.

I wonder if I Brent have data on the number of tickets that that they cancel each year due to warden error… What is of greater interest is whether Brent collect data on number of appealed tickets due to an error on the part of the driver. And can I get it?

  • Author: noc
  • Published: Sep 21st, 2006
  • Comments: None

Parking tickets in Brent and the FoI Act

Tags: , ,

Shahrar Ali, a Green Party candidate at both this years local and last years national elections, sent me an email yesterday on a topic important to car-owners – Penalty Charge Notices, or, rather, f’ing-tickets, as I’m sure most of us refer to them. Shahrar told me about meeting Brent residents while campaigning during the local elections and a common gripe that came up – being issued with a ticket on a public holiday.

He writes:

“Trouble is, “Restrictions apply on Bank Holidays” signage is to be found only on some of the posts as one enters the zone. But most people, reasonably in my view, take their cue from the signage in the bays – which without any explicit indication to the contrary they will assume does not apply on public holidays.

Brent can’t have it both ways. Had the assumption not been justified there would hardly be a need for the additional signage. The trouble is these signs are not fit for purpose, ie. noticeable.

What’s at issue? Nobody likes to get a fine at the best of times, but the suspicion is that signage has been erected to maximise the chances of catching people out and making a quick buck. That’s dishonest and only fuels resentment towards local government – increasing cynicsm and eroding trust in public or democratic institutions, moreover.”

Shahrar made a reuqest under the Freedom of Information Act for data from Brent Council on the volume of parking tickets issued in a single Controled Parking Zone in Brent on both Bank Holiday Mondays and the normal Mondays preceeding and following them.
Shahrar writes: “The results of my request surely confirm that the majority of drivers have been caught out on public holidays not because they were “trying to get away with it” (in the words of one council official) but because they were duped.”

“The figures below are well into DOUBLE FIGURES for all the recent public holidays in April and May, but remain in single figures (and many times less) for the same days of the week only one week before or after that (the data control set).”

Freedom of Information Act 2000 – Penalty Charge Notices in KR-CPZ – Dates followed by Number of Penalty Charge Notices:

  • Friday 7 April 2006: 4
  • Friday 14 April 2006 [Good Friday]: 27
  • Monday 17 April 2006 [Easter Monday]: 30
  • Monday 24 April 2006: 6
  • Monday 1 May 2006 [Bank Holiday]: 47
  • Monday 22 May 2006: 9
  • Monday 29 May 2006 [Bank Holiday]: 58

[source: Brent Council, 2 Aug 2006]

“It hardly looks as if word is getting round! That’s only for one zone covering a handful of streets. It must be quite a money spinner borough-wide. Indeed, not all our zones get the same treatment, only adding to the confusion.”

“NB. For avoidance of doubt, I do not think that dishonest parking fines is a legitimate means to turn people away from using their cars, even if I’d like to reduce such
dependency!”

SKNDC community network ideas

Tags: , ,

Last year SKNDC advertised for interested parties to propose solutions for a wireless network project in South Kilburn. Comwifinet responded and we won the work. Yet the project was shelved as the budget for ICT in the Home ran out.

SKFM, the community radio station broadcasting from the NDC area, is currently streaming to listeners over the internet. Listening to the stream reminded me of the community network project and I’ve begun to make contact with SKNDC again. Here’s a link to a presentation I’ve prepared and begun to dsiitribute to people active in the SKNDC project. The presentation gives an introduction to community network projects and proposes some ideas and models for a community network in South Kilburn.

  • Author: noc
  • Published: Sep 19th, 2006
  • Comments: None

community network presentation – Tower Hamlets

Tags: , ,

Here’s a link to the presentation for viewing in a web browser. You can also download a PDF of the presentation if you need (and I stress NEED) to print it.

  • Author: noc
  • Published: Sep 18th, 2006
  • Comments: None

Tower Hamlets – community wireless

Tags: , , ,

Visiting Tower Hamlets today to talk about seeding a sustainable community enterprise while increasing participation and technology access using wireless technologies. More to post on this later.

© 2009 robdyke.com/noc. All Rights Reserved.

This blog is powered by Wordpress and Magatheme by Bryan Helmig.