<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dollis Hill House renewal project in jeopardy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robdyke.com/noc/2008/11/10/dollis-hill-house-renewal-project-in-jeopardy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robdyke.com/noc/2008/11/10/dollis-hill-house-renewal-project-in-jeopardy/</link>
	<description>network operations centre...no overall control</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:41:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reatha</title>
		<link>http://www.robdyke.com/noc/2008/11/10/dollis-hill-house-renewal-project-in-jeopardy/comment-page-1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>Reatha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 05:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robdyke.com/noc/2008/11/10/dollis-hill-house-renewal-project-in-jeopardy/#comment-937</guid>
		<description>With every thing that seems to be building within this specific subject material, a significant percentage of points of view are generally very exciting. Nonetheless, I am sorry, but I can not subscribe to your entire strategy, all be it radical none the less. It seems to everybody that your opinions are not entirely rationalized and in simple fact you are yourself not even totally confident of the point. In any case I did appreciate reading it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With every thing that seems to be building within this specific subject material, a significant percentage of points of view are generally very exciting. Nonetheless, I am sorry, but I can not subscribe to your entire strategy, all be it radical none the less. It seems to everybody that your opinions are not entirely rationalized and in simple fact you are yourself not even totally confident of the point. In any case I did appreciate reading it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

